Infants who exhibit a consistent right hand preference are more likely to develop advanced language skills by age two, according to a study by FIU psychologist Eliza L. Nelson. The findings were recently published in the journal of Developmental Psychology.
In the study, Nelson measured handedness – the tendency to use one hand more naturally than the other – in different ways according to the age-appropriate motor level. She looked at how infants used their hands to pick up toys and compared it to how they used their hands in combination to manipulate toys as toddlers.
“We can’t ask an infant to write, as we might do with an adult participant,” Nelson said. “So a challenge for researchers studying the development of handedness is to choose tasks that are fun and engaging for the child and sufficiently challenging without being frustrating.”
The study suggests there may be an advantage to having consistent hand preference as an infant. Results showed children who had clear early hand preference performed better on language skills tests than those who did not develop handedness until toddlerhood. Those who were inconsistent in their hand use as infants, but developed a preference for the left or right hand as toddlers, had language scores in the typical range for their age.
“We know that when children enter school they vary in their language and fine motor abilities, and these differences are linked to later academic achievement,” Nelson said. “Our larger goal in this work is to identify how language and motor skills are linked in development and to identify earlier markers of school readiness.”
Nelson tracked 38 children over 16 monthly visits – nine infant visits at 6 to 14 months of age, and seven toddler visits at 18 to 24 months of age. Language skills were measured by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – an individually administered test designed to assess developmental functioning of infants and toddlers. Some children showed a clear right-hand preference during the infant visits and continued to be right-handed as toddlers. Others did not show a clear hand preference as infants, but were either right or left-handed by age two.
Nelson’s research on handedness consistency and the emergence of language skills is ongoing. She and her team will continue to follow these children until the age of 5. Nelson’s study was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Very interesting!
Interesting!
“… consistent right hand preference …” – was this chosen because right handers are more frequent than left-handed people? Because earlier studies I read seem to show that, at least among left-handed boys, language capabilities are better than with right-handed children. Now I do not know if these studies adjusted for unclear handedness. However, while this proves that children might learn to speak earlier, the more interesting thing would be to see if later in life, assuming unclear handedness means more interconnected between the left and right brain hemispheres and thus maybe better artistic abilities, if later these children still are better at using language creatively or if they tend to become the “dry, accountant” type? After all, studies with Chinese show that their language centers in their brains are not as clearly left-brained as in our culture as they do not use an alphabet (digital) but rather pictorial representations of the spoken words.