Teaching Diversity
Through Ethics By Michael
Bugeja
 |
| Michael Bugeja |
One day,” said
an African American professor at a faculty meeting,
“I would like my white colleagues to know
what it feels like to be black.” Usually
reserved, always gracious, this professor had
endured countless meetings on diversity, myriad
seminars on sensitivity, and overlooked everyday
slights, only to realize that everyday slights
were worthy of more debate in academe.
“Just one day,”
she repeated. “Then you would know what
it is like.”
No one responded, and
the discussion soon moved to less weighty concerns—office
space, budgets, special events—topics that
most of us could debate with customary pettiness
and passion.
I made a note to visit
my colleague at a future date when we could chat
in private. I had some good news about my media
ethics class because I had designed an exercise
to give white students the experience of being
African American.
I teach diversity through
ethics. I do not preach about or politicize the
subject matter. I try to reach students on an
emotional, experiential level rather than on an
abstract, philosophical one.
Let me explain.
Telling the truth is
a fundamental requirement in a media ethics class.
We don’t wax philosophical about it, citing
Immanuel Kant; we start with attendance. Students
may miss as many of my lectures as they like,
as long as they send me an email explaining the
real reason for missing class.
The policy requires students to disclose information
appropriately. (They tell me about medical appointments,
not symptoms.) They also learn about priorities
and often experience pangs of conscience upon
informing me that they skipped class to watch
soap operas, for instance.
The Chronicle of Higher
Education actually covered the policy in the May
30, 1997, issue: “Ohio U. Professor Will
Take Any Excuse for Students’ Absences.”
There is method (pedagogy) to the madness. After
more than a quarter-century teaching, I know that
students merely take notes and purge if I preach
about the importance of honesty. However, by doing
journal exercises, students can experience that
importance independently and not only understand
the ethics lesson; they also live it.
The challenge is designing
an exercise that will yield consistent results,
quarter after quarter.
For one week students are asked to keep track
of all the lies that they tell others, all the
lies that they believe others have told them,
and all the times that they were tempted to lie
but told the truth. In each instance, they are
asked to predict consequences and then track actual
ones.
Results each term are remarkably similar. Students
underestimate the consequences of their own lies
and deal harshly with others who spread lies.
Telling the truth when tempted to lie, they feel
ashamed or afraid in the short term but relieved
in the long term. They sleep at night.
But for one day, just
one day, how to make them feel African American?
My colleague had been speaking metaphorically.
Some days are more intense than others. Her intent
was to communicate to white colleagues how it
feels to be a person of color at certain moments.
Moments of bias—being ignored in stores
or stopped in cars or patronized in committees.
Such incidents happen
to us all. They just happen more frequently to
African Americans than to Caucasians.
This is part of communication theory, which assesses
slices of time. The communication process also
is significant, taking into account such variables
as sender and receiver of a message and the circumstances
in which the message is conveyed.
I constructed an exercise meant to evoke emotions
and experiences. Because these can be sensitive
and private, students summarize in journals rather
than share their thoughts in class.
Instructions are as
follows: “When we communicate with others,
we also anticipate a response that suits the occasion.
An ‘occasion’ is a moment in your
life, associated with a place, a person, and a
time. It is one thing to discuss bias with a friend
on a Tuesday in the cafeteria; it is another to
do so with an adversary at a conference on Martin
Luther King Day.”
Students are asked
to recall:
| 1. |
An event or situation
about which you felt great enthusiasm and
the urge to share that enthusiasm with a significant
person, group or authority figure. |
| 2. |
The sharing of that enthusiasm
with that person, group or figure, anticipating
support or approval. |
| 3. |
The feeling you experienced
upon receiving an opposite message—criticism
or rejection—from that person, group,
or figure. |
| 4. |
In a phrase or two, explain
how the response made you feel. |
And, as in the attendance and lying exercises,
responses tend to be similar. Here are selected
ones from a recent media ethics class:
- “You wonder why you made
the attempt in the first place.”
- “You feel worthless or
stupid.”
- “You think, ‘Why
dream? Why care?’”
- “You cut off ties.”
- “You fight. You want to
get to the bottom “of it.”
Those phrases, of course, describe
how it feels to experience bias. Students are
told, “Although you may not be a person
of color or experience racism every day, you can
deal with it effectively as a journalist by being
able to identify with it on this rudimentary level.”
I approached my colleague
a week after the faculty meeting and shared the
above exercise with her. She plans to introduce
it to her news-writing students and that, coming
from someone I so admire, has made me ponder a
new exercise: Understanding Diversity.
In this new journal
assignment, I will ask students to go through
the same process as above, with one variation
in Step #3: “Describe the feeling you experienced
upon receiving support and approval from that
person, group, or figure.”
To understand that
is to celebrate rather than practice diversity.
If you are interested
in how we celebrate diversity in media ethics
class, visit this Website: http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/
~bugeja /diversity.html. |